| From: | Jan Wieck <jan(at)wi3ck(dot)info> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jacob Champion <pchampion(at)vmware(dot)com>, "ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp" <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, "magnus(at)hagander(dot)net" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PROXY protocol support |
| Date: | 2021-03-04 20:29:28 |
| Message-ID: | 76b6a0d6-d2d2-3ac1-5e93-627b5f2cd9bb@wi3ck.info |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 3/4/21 2:45 PM, Jacob Champion wrote:
> On Thu, 2021-03-04 at 10:42 +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
>> Is there any formal specification for the "a protocol common and very
>> light weight in proxies"?
>
> See
>
> https://www.haproxy.org/download/1.8/doc/proxy-protocol.txt
>
> which is maintained by HAProxy Technologies.
>
> --Jacob
>
This looks like it would only need a few extra protocol messages to be
understood by the backend. It might be possible to implement that with
the loadable wire protocol extensions proposed here:
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/32/3018/
Regards, Jan
--
Jan Wieck
Principle Database Engineer
Amazon Web Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2021-03-04 20:30:08 | Re: CI/windows docker vs "am a service" autodetection on windows |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2021-03-04 20:08:30 | Re: CI/windows docker vs "am a service" autodetection on windows |