| From: | "Graeme B(dot) Bell" <grb(at)skogoglandskap(dot)no> |
|---|---|
| To: | "pgsql-pkg-yum(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-pkg-yum(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | PGDG repo differences for RHEL 6.6 / 7. |
| Date: | 2015-01-26 11:57:58 |
| Message-ID: | 76CB7B29-690F-4291-8657-A11804DBC209@skogoglandskap.no |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-pkg-yum |
Hi,
We use PGDG rpms for postgres and postgis, and to make sure postgis works as expected we use the PGDG GDAL build that accompanies it.
However, we run Centos 7 on some machines (mostly newer development machines) and Centos 6.6 on our servers.
Is there a reason why the RHEL6 branch of PGDG uses gdal 1.9, whereas the RHEL7 branch uses gdal 1.11?
Currently because PGDG postgis/gdal rpms are built against two different versions of gdal which means our systems aren't consistent.
For example, drivers, bugfixes/performance are different.
For GIS database work it would be great if we could keep these consistent and then we know that GDAL-originating errors will be replicable in both environments.
Graeme.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tomonari Katsumata | 2015-01-27 05:12:21 | Init script for Slony-I has been broken. |
| Previous Message | Sébastien Lardière | 2015-01-21 17:55:11 | Re: Skytools package : missing things |