| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: documentation structure |
| Date: | 2024-03-25 15:26:20 |
| Message-ID: | 7698f0d0-28a1-4f0c-a326-3d1e7d98dd95@eisentraut.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 22.03.24 14:59, Robert Haas wrote:
> And I don't believe that if someone were writing a physical book about
> PostgreSQL from scratch, they'd ever end up with a top-level chapter
> that looks anything like our GiST chapter. All of the index AM
> chapters are quite obviously clones of each other, and they're all
> quite short. Surely you'd make them sections within a chapter, not
> entire chapters.
>
> I do agree that PL/pgsql is more arguable. I can imagine somebody
> writing a book about PostgreSQL and choosing to make that topic into a
> whole chapter.
Yeah, I think there is probably a range of of things from pretty obvious
to mostly controversial.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2024-03-25 15:29:55 | Re: pgsql: Track last_inactive_time in pg_replication_slots. |
| Previous Message | Nathan Bossart | 2024-03-25 15:21:21 | Re: add AVX2 support to simd.h |