From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Eric B(dot) Ridge" <ebr(at)tcdi(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: division by zero |
Date: | 2003-03-08 18:19:03 |
Message-ID: | 7695.1047147543@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
"Eric B. Ridge" <ebr(at)tcdi(dot)com> writes:
> select 1/0; fails as expected on my x86 Linux box, so yer right, it's
> just my little Mac. "I switched because Mac's can divide by zero."
I checked into this, and indeed OS X 10.2 is behaving funny: integer
divide by zero doesn't raise any signal, it just returns a bogus answer.
They're within their rights to do so according to the ANSI C spec
(wherein division by zero is stated to have undefined behavior).
But since other BSD-derived Unixen all seem to raise SIGFPE, I can't
help wondering if this shouldn't be considered a bug.
I think we have three possible responses:
1. Put explicit tests for zero into the integer division SQL function
routines.
2. Consider this Apple's problem and file a bug report.
3. Both.
I don't care for answer #1 alone, because it would only catch zero
divides in the specific places we put in tests; internal errors would
likely go uncaught. So I think a complaint to Apple is in order.
I'm not sure whether to also put in zero-divide guards. Comments?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-03-08 19:20:52 | Re: My contract has been renewed |
Previous Message | Detlef Jockheck | 2003-03-08 18:15:45 | PostgreSQL Frontend for Windows |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2003-03-08 18:31:00 | Re: [GENERAL] division by zero |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-03-08 17:41:03 | Re: regression failure in CVS HEAD |