Re: pg_dump -j against standbys

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_dump -j against standbys
Date: 2016-05-26 15:57:00
Message-ID: 7692.1464278220@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> Here's an updated patch based on this,and the other feedback.

Looks sane in a quick once-over, but I haven't tested it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-05-26 16:15:29 Re: Parallel pg_dump's error reporting doesn't work worth squat
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-05-26 15:54:35 Re: Fix a failure of pg_dump with !HAVE_LIBZ