Re: Speed of postgres compared to ms sql, is this

I'm the OP, ran into this today and thought I'd give it some exposure

http://spyced.blogspot.com/2006/12/benchmark-postgresql-beats-stuffing.html

From the article

Benchmark: PostgreSQL beats the stuffing out of MySQL

This is interesting, because the conventional wisdom of idiots on slashdot
continues to be "use postgresql if you need advanced features, but use mysql
if all you care about is speed," despite all the head-to-head benchmarks
I've seen by third parties showing PostgreSQL to be faster under load.

Josh Rovero wrote:
>
> _____
>
> From: novnov [mailto:novnovice(at)gmail(dot)com]
> To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Sent: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 20:15:08 -0500
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Speed of postgres compared to ms sql, is this
>
>
> I agree with what you say. And I'd still be interesting in hearing of
> first
> hand experience with the speed of the two databases from someone who is
> 'good' at both. The article commentor was obviously not a pgsql expert.
> I've
> heard recently that pgsql is as fast as mysql, so it seems odd that ms
> sql
> would be faster than pgsql. The actual test, what was use to benchmark,
> would make a difference of course.
>
> I'm hoping someone with a good handle on both databases has direct
> experience can chime in here.We use both native PostgreSQL and SQL
> Server Desktop Edition (MSDE),
> but not generally for exactly the same things.
>
> We use PostgreSQL on a multi-platform (HP-UX, Solaris, Linux, Windows)
> commercial application suite. Works great handles tens of gigabytes
> per day in data insertions, updates, and retirements with almost
> zero administration. Servers running the database stay up forever.
> We chose PostgreSQL as the best value after analyzing competing commercial
> and open source RDBMS systems in a formal DAR (Decision Analysis
> Resolution)
> process.
>
> We use MSDE on a government project where both the specific database
> version
> and committee-designed database schema from hell were mandated.
> There are plenty of instances when SQL Server is less than optimal and
> maddening. The MSDE version also limits connections, throttles
> performance
> for simultaneous queries, etc. And there's no way you'd ever pick it for
> multiplatform use or portability.
>

--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Speed-of-postgres-compared-to-ms-sql%2C-is-this-article-comment-off--tf2614575.html#a7682549
Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.