Re: transaction example just pathetic

From: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
To: drew(dot)degraff(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: transaction example just pathetic
Date: 2023-07-14 08:33:50
Message-ID: 767c499fadc4dc03d18c346f7a9932dcddda4057.camel@cybertec.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Thu, 2023-07-13 at 18:59 +0000, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/14/tutorial-transactions.html
> Description:
>
> The explanation of transactions is pathetic.  Why are you showing bad
> design...then saying it doesn't matter.   And then in your transaction
> block, you only show one update statement.   Well, you just could have shown
> the complete example if you didn't have the two stupid branch updates to
> begin with.   And you want people to believe postgres is good, get its
> documentation is so poor.

The documentation is not half as bad as this unspecific problem report.

But I guess you are out to rant, not to get anything improved.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Niels Bom 2023-07-14 12:09:36 Link to Slack dead, is Slack still used?
Previous Message PG Doc comments form 2023-07-13 18:59:00 transaction example just pathetic