Re: confusion about this commit "Revert "Skip redundant anti-wraparound vacuums""

we will update all commits with latest version certaintly, but we must confirm that this issue is same with it currently we
can not confirm this issue can be fixed by revert 2aa6e331ead7f3ad080561495ad4bd3bc7cd8913 this commit,
so i just query about how this commit can trigger autovacuum lock down or does not work.

| |
jiye
|
|
jiye_sw(at)126(dot)com
|
---- Replied Message ----
| From | Julien Rouhaud<rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Date | 6/7/2023 15:36 |
| To | jiye<jiye_sw(at)126(dot)com> |
| Cc | robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com<robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> ,
tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us<tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> ,
pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org<pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject | Re: confusion about this commit "Revert "Skip redundant anti-wraparound vacuums"" |
On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 03:12:44PM +0800, jiye wrote:
actually out test instance include 2aa6e331ead7f3ad080561495ad4bd3bc7cd8913
this commit, not yet reverted this commit.

Are you saying that you're doing tests relying on a version that's missing
about 3 years of security and bug fixes? You should definitely update to the
latest minor version (currently 12.15) and keep applying all minor versions as
they get released.