| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [DOCS] Autovacuum and XID wraparound |
| Date: | 2007-05-16 21:20:56 |
| Message-ID: | 7667.1179350456@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-patches |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
>>> How about freezing anything older than vacuum_freeze_min_age, just like
>>> VACUUM does?
>>
>> I suppose that'd be OK, but is it likely to be worth the trouble?
> I think so, because it means that people using CLUSTER to keep the size
> of tables in line instead of VACUUM, would not need the otherwise
> mandatory VACUUM.
Fair enough. Who will fix the already-applied patch?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-05-16 21:25:50 | Re: [doc patch] a slight VACUUM / VACUUM FULL doc improvement proposal |
| Previous Message | Michael Stone | 2007-05-16 21:17:16 | Re: [doc patch] a slight VACUUM / VACUUM FULL doc improvement proposal |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-05-16 21:41:30 | Re: [DOCS] Autovacuum and XID wraparound |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-05-16 21:05:32 | Re: [DOCS] Autovacuum and XID wraparound |