From: | Rick Gigger <rick(at)alpinenetworking(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | ohp(at)pyrenet(dot)fr, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: should I worry? |
Date: | 2007-11-05 20:30:02 |
Message-ID: | 765D7D83-A99E-4398-B430-25FF06B5A270@alpinenetworking.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Doesn't DROP TRIGGER require the name of the trigger? He says they
are unnamed. How then does he drop them?
On Nov 5, 2007, at 6:31 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> ohp(at)pyrenet(dot)fr writes:
>> On Sun, 4 Nov 2007, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> So you have a *bunch* of partially broken FK constraints in that
>>> source
>>> database.
>
>> I just talk to my customer and he/we'll make a big batch deleting and
>> recreating all foreign keys on 8.2.5.
>> The question is, how do we get rid of those useless <unamed>
>> triggers?
>
> DROP TRIGGER should be fine.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that
> your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2007-11-05 20:40:58 | Re: should I worry? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-11-05 20:02:06 | Re: Is necessary to use SEQ_MAXVALUE in pg_dump? |