From: | Bob <luckyratfoot(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Matt McNeil <mcneil(at)callahanpro(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Transparent encryption in PostgreSQL? |
Date: | 2005-07-14 04:18:04 |
Message-ID: | 762e5c05071321184e5bb8fd@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Here is the link in case your fingers are broken and it hurts to type;)
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.0/interactive/encryption-options.html
On 7/13/05, Matt McNeil <mcneil(at)callahanpro(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Greetings,
> I need to securely store lots of sensitive contact information and
> notes in a freely available database (eg PostgreSQL or MySQL) that will be
> stored on a database server which I do not have direct access to.
> This database will be accessed by a PHP application that I am
> developing. However, I also need to be able to search/sort these data
> with the database functions (SELECT, ORDER BY, regexes, etc) so encrypting
> on
> the client side (web application) or using encryption of specific fields
> would not work. (For example, I need to encrypt
> contacts' names, but need to be able to search for results by name). (I
> realize I could load the entire table into memory with PHP and
> process/search/sort it there, but
> that's obviously not a very good solution). Ideally I would like to
> encrypt entire tables. I read something about the pgcrypto contrib
> module, but have't been able to discern if it can do ecryption in a
> transparent way (e.g. so that I can do regex searches on the data).
> My sense is that this is a difficult problem. However, I made the
> mistake of promising this functionality,
> so I'm scrambling to figure out some kind of solution. Any
> suggestions?
> Thanks so much!
> Matt
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gregory Youngblood | 2005-07-14 04:27:48 | Re: Errors building older versions of PostgreSQL |
Previous Message | Stuart Bishop | 2005-07-14 04:03:13 | Re: Japanese words not distinguished |