Re: Possible move away from PG

From: Bob <luckyratfoot(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jason Tesser <jtesser(at)nbbc(dot)edu>
Cc: Pgsql <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Possible move away from PG
Date: 2005-06-30 18:07:17
Message-ID: 762e5c05063011077b5f77bd@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

PL/SQL is awesome just awesome no doubt about it.
But if you like to pay at a minium for 5 users 800 bucks then stick with
PL/SQL. I personally can live with pl/psql and at a higher level postgresql
to be honest. Not to mention the rate that things are being added and
improved is mind numbing. Depends on your setup though. Do you really need
all the bells and whistles that PL/SQL gives you given the cost and
maintence of Oracle databases.

On 6/30/05, Jason Tesser <jtesser(at)nbbc(dot)edu> wrote:
>
> I am not familar with how to do this. Could you give me an example of how
> this could help?
>
> <snip>
> >
> > Have you considered returing refcursors instead of setof some type.
> >
> > Kris Jurka
>
> --
> Jason Tesser
> Developer for NMI
> jtesser(at)nbbc(dot)edu
> Eph 2:8-10
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marek Lewczuk 2005-06-30 18:07:22 Re: COnsidering a move away from Postgres
Previous Message Derry Bryson 2005-06-30 17:56:21 Get Query in Statement Level Trigger?