| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)surnet(dot)cl>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: psql backslash consistency |
| Date: | 2005-05-28 15:12:59 |
| Message-ID: | 7627.1117293179@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> writes:
> I'm not against the idea of a config variable, but this is what, the
> third or fourth go around on this? It seems rather unfair to put this
> burden upon the current patch writer at this stage of the game...
The fact that objections keep being raised should suggest to you that
the idea is not uncontroversial. I think it's necessary to look for a
compromise that everyone can live with. You're really wasting your
breath to repeat the same arguments over and over and expect that
anyone's mind will change.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-05-28 16:03:38 | Re: hash index work |
| Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2005-05-28 14:23:37 | Re: psql backslash consistency |