| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] New TODO item |
| Date: | 1999-06-18 14:44:36 |
| Message-ID: | 7626.929717076@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> writes:
> I'm not recalling why we would want to handle bare relation names in
> an expression, ...
> Would you prefer that we do nothing until I have a chance to research
> this some more, or is someone going to dive in?
Research away. As far as I can see, this isn't affecting processing of
any valid queries; it's just a matter of less-than-desirable response
to an invalid one. So I think we can take our time about fixing it.
I know I've got other things to work on...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-06-18 16:47:13 | Re: [HACKERS] tables > 1 gig |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 1999-06-18 14:42:11 | Re: [HACKERS] tables > 1 gig |