From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Volunteer to build a configuration tool |
Date: | 2007-06-20 05:43:50 |
Message-ID: | 7621.1182318230@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-performance |
Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, 20 Jun 2007, Mike Benoit wrote:
>> I don't think something like this would be very difficult at all to
>> write
> Here I just smile and say that proves you've never tried to write one :)
I'm with Greg on this. It's not that easy to optimize in a
multi-parameter space even if all conditions are favorable, and they
never are.
I think what would be much more useful in the long run is some
serious study of the parameters themselves. For instance,
random_page_cost is a self-admitted oversimplification of reality.
We know that good settings for it depend critically on how large
your DB is relative to your RAM; which means there are at least two
parameters there, but no one's done any serious thinking about how
to disentangle 'em.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Smith | 2007-06-20 06:45:27 | Re: Volunteer to build a configuration tool |
Previous Message | Greg Smith | 2007-06-20 05:03:19 | Re: Volunteer to build a configuration tool |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Smith | 2007-06-20 06:24:03 | Re: PostgreSQL Configuration Tool for Dummies |
Previous Message | Greg Smith | 2007-06-20 05:03:19 | Re: Volunteer to build a configuration tool |