From: | Joshua Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-rrreviewers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [RRR] 9.2 CF2: 20 days in |
Date: | 2011-07-07 17:27:42 |
Message-ID: | 7610972b-6410-4720-9c10-a9b788b5aa31@mail-1.01.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-rrreviewers |
Robert,
> We need to start marking the patches that are "Waiting on Author" as
> "Returned with Feedback", ideally after checking that the status in
> the CF application is in fact up to date. With a week left in the
> CommitFest at this point, anything that has been reviewed and still
> has issues is pretty much going to have to wait for the next round.
> We need to focus on (a) reviewing the patches that haven't been
> reviewed yet and (b) getting the stuff that is basically in good
> shape
> committed. Otherwise, we're still going to be doing this CommitFest
> in September
Sure, I only want to do that for ones which have been waiting on author for more than a couple days though. Working on that.
> I have been attempting to keep somewhat on top of the stuff that has
> become Ready for Committer, but there is too much of it for me to
> handle by myself.
Yeah, given that we're still in beta, I expected committing to be a problem. Not a surprise.
--Josh
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-07-07 17:31:45 | Re: Moving the community git server |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-07-07 17:26:10 | Re: Inconsistency between postgresql.conf and docs |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-07-07 17:35:13 | Re: [RRR] 9.2 CF2: 20 days in |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-07-07 16:31:55 | Re: [RRR] 9.2 CF2: 20 days in |