| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improved parallel make support |
| Date: | 2010-11-16 22:28:43 |
| Message-ID: | 7608.1289946523@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> On mn, 2010-11-15 at 23:34 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> It's clear to me that we are very far from having a handle on what
>> it'll really take to run parallel builds safely, and I am therefore
>> now of the opinion that we ought to revert the patch.
> We don't have to revert it, we just have to insert .NOTPARALLEL targets
> into some places that are not properly "parallelized", thus effectively
> restoring the behavior of the old for loop. I have attached a patch
> that gets make -j 100+ working for me. Other platforms might need more
> things, perhaps.
If we don't have to revert it entirely, that's of course better. Please
apply what you've got.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2010-11-17 03:20:03 | pgsql: Require VALUE keyword when extending an enum type. Based on a pa |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2010-11-16 21:41:33 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improved parallel make support |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2010-11-16 22:30:29 | Re: unlogged tables |
| Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2010-11-16 22:26:34 | Re: possible concurrency bug or mistake in understanding read-committed behavior |