| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jelte Fennema-Nio <me(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Support a wildcard in backtrace_functions |
| Date: | 2024-04-29 09:12:01 |
| Message-ID: | 75e7ccfa-2351-4d28-a7ac-3279049382e3@eisentraut.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 27.04.24 00:16, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 02:39:16PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Well, in that case we have to have some kind of control GUC, and
>> I think the consensus is that the one we have now is under-designed.
>> So I also vote for a full revert and try again in v18.
>
> Okay, fine by me to move on with a revert.
Ok, it's reverted.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2024-04-29 09:19:48 | Re: A failure in prepared_xacts test |
| Previous Message | Richard Guo | 2024-04-29 09:11:19 | Re: A failure in prepared_xacts test |