Re: Should core decide the name?

From: "Dawid Kuroczko" <qnex42(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Ron Peterson" <ron(dot)peterson(at)yellowbank(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Should core decide the name?
Date: 2007-08-31 01:05:21
Message-ID: 758d5e7f0708301805l21c1bd6el41f1dc6072ee4ba8@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On 8/31/07, Ron Peterson <ron(dot)peterson(at)yellowbank(dot)com> wrote:
> I'm going to repost the question I posed in my last email as the start
> of what I'm hoping might be a thread to end this discussion.
>
> Are you willing to accept the resolution of the naming question as a
> pronouncement from core, who can decide the matter amongst themselves
> however they see fit?
>
> +1 for me.

Personally I feel that it goes without saying. They [the core] do most
of the work, and they do excellent work, so I feel confident that whatever
they choose will be for the best. They should be the ones to decide
such important matters -- it is their blood and sweat in the source code. :)

I don't want to say that community has no voice in it -- it has, and it
is important, just as the community is important for our favourite RDBMS,
but I would hate to usurp power over Core. :)

Regards,
Dawid

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2007-08-31 01:16:35 Re: Should core decide the name?
Previous Message Dawid Kuroczko 2007-08-31 00:58:11 Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)