| From: | "Dawid Kuroczko" <qnex42(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Ron Peterson" <ron(dot)peterson(at)yellowbank(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Should core decide the name? |
| Date: | 2007-08-31 01:05:21 |
| Message-ID: | 758d5e7f0708301805l21c1bd6el41f1dc6072ee4ba8@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On 8/31/07, Ron Peterson <ron(dot)peterson(at)yellowbank(dot)com> wrote:
> I'm going to repost the question I posed in my last email as the start
> of what I'm hoping might be a thread to end this discussion.
>
> Are you willing to accept the resolution of the naming question as a
> pronouncement from core, who can decide the matter amongst themselves
> however they see fit?
>
> +1 for me.
Personally I feel that it goes without saying. They [the core] do most
of the work, and they do excellent work, so I feel confident that whatever
they choose will be for the best. They should be the ones to decide
such important matters -- it is their blood and sweat in the source code. :)
I don't want to say that community has no voice in it -- it has, and it
is important, just as the community is important for our favourite RDBMS,
but I would hate to usurp power over Core. :)
Regards,
Dawid
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-08-31 01:16:35 | Re: Should core decide the name? |
| Previous Message | Dawid Kuroczko | 2007-08-31 00:58:11 | Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |