| From: | "Dawid Kuroczko" <qnex42(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Bruno Wolff III" <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Let's make CPgAN! |
| Date: | 2006-05-22 10:35:56 |
| Message-ID: | 758d5e7f0605220335g1fd02155y6c11c5500d6cb72@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 5/20/06, Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to> wrote:
> I am not sure that Postgres needs CPAN. CPAN is particularly useful for
> handling dependencies. I doubt that there will be lots of dependencies in
> Postgres add ons. So having something like the current system where you
> download and build packages from source isn't going to be improved much
> with a CPAN like system.
Hmm, I was thinking rather it would be more a definitive system to look
for PgSQL extenstions and a way to encourage distributors to package
the extensions together with "mainstream" PostgreSQL. :)
Regards,
Dawid
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Rovero | 2006-05-22 11:45:41 | PostgreSQL and EnterpriseDB in New York Times |
| Previous Message | Ragnar | 2006-05-22 10:25:20 | Re: SQL & Binary Data Questions |