From: | "Dawid Kuroczko" <qnex42(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Lukas Smith" <smith(at)pooteeweet(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "PostgreSQL Advocacy" <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? |
Date: | 2006-05-20 12:29:01 |
Message-ID: | 758d5e7f0605200529s21bc6b4aye428e35977bd6d04@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
On 5/20/06, Lukas Smith <smith(at)pooteeweet(dot)org> wrote:
> The improvements to the installer are great, but there simply needs to
> be a packaged solution that adds more of the things people are very
> likely to use. From my understanding Bizgres goes in that direction? I
> just think that whatever highly packaged solution PostgreSQL picks, this
> should be the download that is pushed at conferences, in articles and
> books. People with a clue will still know where they can get the clean base.
Hmm, a Comprehensive PostgreSQL Archive Network? ;)
I mean, something like CPAN, CTAN or CRAN? :)
I mean, the -contrib is great, but pushing other things there is a bit
tricky (to say the least) from the maintenance point of view. (Every
bugfix, a new release of -contrib, etc, etc...).
Then again PGfoundry is great to keep development centered, but
finding and building a new package is not really a one-liner, and
if you're unlucky you might get alpha-quality code installed. :)
I think a CPgAN-like solution would be the best. A uniform method
of getting approved Pg extensions. It would simplify installing the
extensions, and would encourage distributions to package such
extensions. Somebody suggested apt-get install postgresql-contrib.
Imagine:
apt-get install postgresql-datatype-fqdn
apt-get install postgresql-gist-ltree
...and so on.
Regards,
Dawid
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mark Woodward | 2006-05-20 14:41:21 | Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? |
Previous Message | Tino Wildenhain | 2006-05-20 08:57:14 | Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mark Woodward | 2006-05-20 13:12:21 | Re: String Similarity |
Previous Message | Mark Woodward | 2006-05-20 11:29:28 | Re: String Similarity |