| From: | Dawid Kuroczko <qnex42(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | KÖPFERL Robert <robert(dot)koepferl(at)sonorys(dot)at> |
| Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Stripping raid vs. table spaces |
| Date: | 2005-06-09 11:14:09 |
| Message-ID: | 758d5e7f050609041433c86c69@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On 6/9/05, KÖPFERL Robert <robert(dot)koepferl(at)sonorys(dot)at> wrote:
> Short question:
>
> Is it enugh to have stripping on a disk array?
> Are table spaces then of less use than the actual stripping? So will just
> stripping give me more O/I-performance?
Short answer: if you make one striping partition -- you have better
overall performance.
if you distribute tables using tablespaces -- you make tables
performance more independant from other tables. I.e. large
load on one table has less impact on the load on the other
table.
Personally I would keep indexes on one set of drives and data
on other. All depends on your setup.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2005-06-09 14:11:53 | Re: Stripping raid vs. table spaces |
| Previous Message | KÖPFERL Robert | 2005-06-09 07:16:16 | Stripping raid vs. table spaces |