From: | Dawid Kuroczko <qnex42(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: How to improve db performance with $7K? |
Date: | 2005-04-20 08:55:44 |
Message-ID: | 758d5e7f05042001558f24d0f@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On 4/19/05, Mohan, Ross <RMohan(at)arbinet(dot)com> wrote:
> Clustered file systems is the first/best example that
> comes to mind. Host A and Host B can both request from diskfarm, eg.
Something like a Global File System?
http://www.redhat.com/software/rha/gfs/
(I believe some other company did develop it some time in the past;
hmm, probably the guys doing LVM stuff?).
Anyway the idea is that two machines have same filesystem mounted and
they share it. The locking I believe is handled by communication
between computers using "host to host" SCSI commands.
I never used it, I've only heard about it from a friend who used to
work with it in CERN.
Regards,
Dawid
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Richard van den Berg | 2005-04-20 14:22:24 | When are index scans used over seq scans? |
Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2005-04-20 08:53:12 | Re: immutable functions vs. join for lookups ? |