Re: getting ERROR "relation 16401 has no triggers" with partition foreign key alter

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: getting ERROR "relation 16401 has no triggers" with partition foreign key alter
Date: 2019-08-14 18:22:20
Message-ID: 7573.1565806940@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 2019-Jul-22, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> After looking at the code some more, I think calling the new function in
>> the Prep phase is correct. The attached patch is pretty much final form
>> for this bugfix. I decided to unwrap a couple of error messages (I did
>> get bitten while grepping because of this), and reordered one of the new
>> Identity command cases in ATPrepCmd since it appeared in inconsistent
>> order in that one place of four.

> Pushed to all three branches.

This is still listed as a live issue in

https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_12_Open_Items#Live_issues

Should that be closed now?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2019-08-14 18:33:30 Re: Removing unneeded downlink field from nbtree stack struct
Previous Message Andres Freund 2019-08-14 18:17:09 Re: "long" type is not appropriate for counting tuples