| From: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
| Cc: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Is pg_regress --use-existing used by anyone or is it broken? |
| Date: | 2023-08-29 22:37:03 |
| Message-ID: | 756F891D-4D26-4081-AF71-0A79ACA77FF5@yesql.se |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On 30 Aug 2023, at 00:33, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 2:53 PM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:
>> Having looked a bit more on it I have a feeling that plain removing it would be
>> the best option. Unless someone chimes in as a user of it I'll propose a patch
>> to remove it.
>
> -1. I use it.
Thanks for confirming!
> It's handy when using pg_regress with a custom test suite, where I
> don't want to be nagged about disconnecting from the database every
> time.
I'm curious about your workflow around it, it seems to me that it's kind of
broken so I wonder if we instead then should make it an equal citizen with temp
instance?
--
Daniel Gustafsson
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2023-08-29 22:55:23 | Re: Is pg_regress --use-existing used by anyone or is it broken? |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2023-08-29 22:33:27 | Re: Is pg_regress --use-existing used by anyone or is it broken? |