Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 12:17 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> I went through the system's built-in implicit coercions to see
>> which ones are unconditionally successful. These could all be
>> marked leakproof, as per attached patch.
> IMHO, this is a nice improvement.
Thanks; pushed. On second reading I found that there are a few
non-implicit coercions that could usefully be marked leakproof
as well --- notably float4_numeric and float8_numeric, which should
be error-free now that infinities can be converted.
regards, tom lane