Re: I'm lost :-( with FOR...IN

From: "Alain Roger" <raf(dot)news(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: I'm lost :-( with FOR...IN
Date: 2006-11-07 20:20:21
Message-ID: 75645bbb0611071220n58d1eddfwc49ddf90ce8a4ceb@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

i already tried this possibility and i've got :
ERROR: set-valued function called in context that cannot accept a set
CONTEXT: PL/pgSQL function "sp_u_001" line 26 at return next

:-(

On 11/7/06, Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 7 Nov 2006, Alain Roger wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I' still with my stored procedure :
> >
> > -- Function: SP_U_001(typeofarticle varchar)
> >
> > -- DROP FUNCTION SP_U_001(typeofarticle varchar);
> >
> > CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION SP_U_001(IN typeofarticles VARCHAR)
> > RETURNS SETOF active_articles AS
> > $BODY$
> > DECLARE
> > myrec RECORD;
> > res active_articles;
> > /**************************************/
> > BEGIN
> > FOR myrec IN
> > select *
> > from articles, articletypes, department
> > where
> > articletypes.articletype_type = $1
> > AND articles.articletype_id = articletypes.articletype_id
> > AND articles.department_id = department.department_id
> > AND articles.validity_period_end > now()
> > LOOP
> > IF (myrec IS NOT NULL) THEN
> > res.article_type := myrec.articletypes.articletype_type;
>
> I don't think the column names are going to keep their originating table
> name inside the record, so the field probably needs
> to be referred to as myrec.articletype_type not
> myrec.articletypes.articletype_type.
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alain Roger 2006-11-07 20:32:32 Re: I'm lost :-( with FOR...IN
Previous Message Stephan Szabo 2006-11-07 20:12:15 Re: I'm lost :-( with FOR...IN