Re: massive quotes?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jon Jensen <jon(at)endpoint(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: massive quotes?
Date: 2003-09-11 20:09:10
Message-ID: 756.1063310950@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jon Jensen <jon(at)endpoint(dot)com> writes:
> Is there a reason not to use here documents?

The $$FOO proposal I put forward earlier was consciously modeled on
here-documents. We cannot use exactly the shell syntax for
here-documents, though, mainly because we already have meaning assigned
to strings like <<' (<< is already a standard operator, and the ' could
be the start of an ordinary literal).

I would definitely like to see us adopt a proposal that is like
here-documents to the extent that there's a family of possible
terminator markers and not only one. But we'll have to adjust the
syntax a little bit. If you don't like $$FOO, what else comes to mind?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-09-11 20:31:40 Re: Another small bug (pg_autovacuum)
Previous Message Matthew T. O'Connor 2003-09-11 20:08:12 Re: Another small bug (pg_autovacuum)