| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jon Jensen <jon(at)endpoint(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: massive quotes? |
| Date: | 2003-09-11 20:09:10 |
| Message-ID: | 756.1063310950@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Jon Jensen <jon(at)endpoint(dot)com> writes:
> Is there a reason not to use here documents?
The $$FOO proposal I put forward earlier was consciously modeled on
here-documents. We cannot use exactly the shell syntax for
here-documents, though, mainly because we already have meaning assigned
to strings like <<' (<< is already a standard operator, and the ' could
be the start of an ordinary literal).
I would definitely like to see us adopt a proposal that is like
here-documents to the extent that there's a family of possible
terminator markers and not only one. But we'll have to adjust the
syntax a little bit. If you don't like $$FOO, what else comes to mind?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-09-11 20:31:40 | Re: Another small bug (pg_autovacuum) |
| Previous Message | Matthew T. O'Connor | 2003-09-11 20:08:12 | Re: Another small bug (pg_autovacuum) |