| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Beta2 on Friday Morning (Was: Re: Open 7.3 items) |
| Date: | 2002-09-19 22:26:01 |
| Message-ID: | 7559.1032474361@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Tom Lane writes:
> Yeah, we should do something with that. Are people okay with the idea
> of CREATE LANGUAGE, etc, retroactively changing prorettype from OPAQUE
> to the correct thing?
>>
> Seems like an appropriate time to throw a notice, though.
>>
>> Of course.
> Now that we have additional elog levels, is it a NOTICE or a WARNING. I
> am leaning to the latter.
NOTICE seems sufficient to me.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kris Jurka | 2002-09-19 22:31:57 | Re: Optimizer generates bad plans. |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-09-19 22:09:06 | Re: Optimizer generates bad plans. |