| From: | Erik Wienhold <ewie(at)ewie(dot)name> |
|---|---|
| To: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Cross-Product JOIN? |
| Date: | 2023-05-25 23:23:53 |
| Message-ID: | 753685717.240313.1685057033384@office.mailbox.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
> On 25/05/2023 23:46 CEST Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2023-05-25 at 08:59 +0200, Erik Wienhold wrote:
> > > Since we are talking about Cartesian products: is the term "Cartesian join"
> > > used anywhere?
> >
> > Not in the docs:
>
> I was trying to be funny. The Cartesian product of {Cartesian,cross} and
> {product,join} would be {Cartesian product,Cartesian join,cross product,cross join}.
And someone beat you to it and apparently planted the joke in the codebase.
(Good one, but unfortunately hard to tell apart from a serious question.)
--
Erik
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | PG Doc comments form | 2023-05-30 05:06:58 | 5.11.1 Table Partitioning Overview - "...the size of the table should exceed the physical memory.." |
| Previous Message | Laurenz Albe | 2023-05-25 21:46:13 | Re: Cross-Product JOIN? |