From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Phuong Ma <pma(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: monetary data type |
Date: | 2001-04-06 22:31:15 |
Message-ID: | 7526.986596275@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Phuong Ma <pma(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> I read this from the 7.1 documentation:
> 3.2. Monetary Type
> The money type may become a locale-aware
> layer over the numeric type in a future release.
> The money type stores U.S.-style currency with fixed decimal point
> representation. If Postgres is compiled with locale support then the
> money type uses locale-specific output formatting.
> ----------
> Why does this first say that the money type may become locale-aware in a
> FUTURE release, then the next paragraph says that the money type USES
> locale specific output formatting. So which one is it?
In that sentence, "locale-aware" is an adjective modifying "layer".
It does not say that the current implementation is not locale-aware;
it says that it's not based on numeric.
> Why would it
> be better to use numeric or decimal rather than money data type?
Overflow.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-04-06 23:18:07 | Re: How much log space does VACUUM need? |
Previous Message | Gordon A. Runkle | 2001-04-06 22:18:21 | How much log space does VACUUM need? |