Re: Buffer Management

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Curt Sampson <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net>, "J(dot) R(dot) Nield" <jrnield(at)usol(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Buffer Management
Date: 2002-06-25 14:32:10
Message-ID: 7524.1025015530@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> This will also work well when we have non-SysV semaphore support, like
> Posix semaphores, so we would be able to run with no SysV stuff.

You do realize that we can use Posix semaphores today? The Darwin (OS X)
port uses 'em now. That's one reason I am more interested in mmap as
a shmget substitute than I used to be.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mario Weilguni 2002-06-25 14:45:54 Re: Buffer Management
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-06-25 14:29:49 Re: Buffer Management