Re: Restart pg_usleep when interrupted

From: Sami Imseih <samimseih(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Restart pg_usleep when interrupted
Date: 2024-07-05 16:57:37
Message-ID: 74E5D8C8-6998-4145-BAB1-F7DD861423F9@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
> A more portable approach which could be to continue using nanosleep and
> add checks to ensure that nanosleep exists whenever
> it goes past an absolute time. This was suggested by Bertrand in an offline
> conversation. I am not yet fully convinced of this idea, but posting the patch
> that implements this idea for anyone interested in looking.

oops, forgot to attach the patch. Here it is.

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-vaccum_delay-with-absolute-time-nanosleep.patch application/octet-stream 3.5 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2024-07-05 17:13:09 Re: Built-in CTYPE provider
Previous Message Sami Imseih 2024-07-05 16:49:45 Re: Restart pg_usleep when interrupted