Re: Suitable response to Oracle?

From: Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Nikolay Samokhvalov <samokhvalov(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Advocacy Mailing List <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Suitable response to Oracle?
Date: 2016-03-22 21:02:23
Message-ID: 74B6957C-1D54-4376-98C6-66D95387D004@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On 22 Mar 2016, at 20:58, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 08:43:14PM +0000, Justin Clift wrote:
>> Would something like these be suitable in response to Oracle's
>> recent letter in Russia?
>>
>> http://ded.ninja/dear_oracle/dear_oracle01.jpg
>> http://ded.ninja/dear_oracle/dear_oracle02.jpg
>>
>> They'd need the text translated to Russian, but that's trivial
>> to do (cut-n-paste) if you can email it to me. :)
>
> I like the second one. :-)

Thanks. :)

Open to other wording idea too. They were just the first
best two versions on the spur of the moment.

+ Justin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2016-03-22 21:08:11 Re: 9.6 -> 10.0
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2016-03-22 20:58:37 Re: Suitable response to Oracle?