From: | "Andrus" <kobruleht2(at)hot(dot)ee> |
---|---|
To: | "pgsql-general" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Adrian Klaver" <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: How to start slave after pg_basebackup. Why min_wal_size and wal_keep_segments are duplicated |
Date: | 2020-06-01 05:50:38 |
Message-ID: | 74A42D0ECD334244813128ADE21A2DD4@dell2 |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi!
>> I want to create hot standby async server using
>> /etc/init.d/postgresql stop
>> mv /var/lib/postgresql/12/main /var/lib/postgresql/12/mainold
>> pg_basebackup --write-recovery-conf -D /var/lib/postgresql/12/main
>I don't see where the base backup is being taken from just where it is going.
It is taken from VPS server over 20 Mbit public internet connection.
Both servers are running Debian Linux.
>> I dont receive WALs.
>If you are doing binary replication then you are receiving WALs. It just a matter of whether you are streaming them or shipping
>them over complete.
Using wal_keep_segments=360 also causes same wal file not found error after pg_basebackup.
master server has 6GB wal files. wal log during pg_basebackup is much slower than 360.
Maybe pg_basebackup skips wal segments . Maybe using wal_compression=on causes the issue.
How to fix this ?
How to create base backup so that cluster is tranferred over internet faster? Maybe it can transferred in compressed form over
internet.
Andrus.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tanja Savic | 2020-06-01 07:04:51 | RE: pg_ctl can't start db server |
Previous Message | Stefan Knecht | 2020-06-01 05:36:14 | Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment |