From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Mahendra Singh Thalor <mahi6run(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: change on_exit_nicely_list array to the dynamic array to increase slots at run time for pg_restore |
Date: | 2025-03-10 13:43:08 |
Message-ID: | 749623.1741614188@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Mahendra Singh Thalor <mahi6run(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> While doing some code changes with pg_dumpall and pg_rsetore[1], we noticed
> that on_exit_nicely_list array has only fixed slots (MAX_ON_EXIT_NICELY=20)
> but in some cases, we need more slots for pg_restore.
> *Ex: restore more than 20 databases by single pg_restore command.*
> We are working on a patch[1] which dumps all the databases in non-text mode
> by pg_dumpall and then we are restoring those dumps by pg_restore. So we
> need more slots due to multiple databases.
I can't help thinking that this means you're doing it wrong.
That on_exit infrastructure is quite rickety --- see the comments for
exit_nicely() itself --- so I don't think I trust the idea of
dynamically adding callbacks. In the present usage there is actually
only *one* callback and it's registered very near the start of either
pg_dump or pg_restore. That avoids the platform-dependent hazards
mentioned in the comment, but adding more callbacks later might not.
I think you'd be better off tracking the cleanup work you have to do
in some other place.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kirill Reshke | 2025-03-10 13:56:44 | Re: FSM doesn't recover after zeroing damaged page. |
Previous Message | Kirill Reshke | 2025-03-10 13:33:15 | Re: Vacuum statistics |