Re: ECPG parse.pl and parse2.pl

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ECPG parse.pl and parse2.pl
Date: 2011-06-13 20:20:47
Message-ID: 7481.1307996447@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Surely we don't need parse.pl and parse2.pl? parse.pl, the one that's
> not used, it already showing signs of semi-bit-rot:

> Use of assignment to $[ is deprecated at ./parse.pl line 21.

> I propose that we move parse2.pl to parse.pl and only keep the one.

Yes. This was objected to immediately when Michael made it that way in
the first place, but he didn't change it. I don't think we need to use
HEAD as a repository for obsolete code, when we have a perfectly good
SCM.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dan Ports 2011-06-13 20:29:05 Re: SSI patch renumbered existing 2PC resource managers??
Previous Message richhguard-monotone 2011-06-13 20:10:17 Re: PATCH: CreateComments: use explicit indexing for ``values''