Re: Trusted versus untrusted Pl language

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Steven Pousty <steve(dot)pousty(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Trusted versus untrusted Pl language
Date: 2020-12-24 00:38:16
Message-ID: 748034.1608770296@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

Steven Pousty <steve(dot)pousty(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> 3. An example of how to make a pre-installed untrusted langue into a
> trusted language

Under what circumstances would that be a good idea?

I can't imagine that we'd really want to recommend end users doing
that, but an example would surely be taken as a recommendation
that it's okay to do it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2020-12-24 00:49:22 Re: Trusted versus untrusted Pl language
Previous Message Steven Pousty 2020-12-23 23:18:32 Re: Trusted versus untrusted Pl language