| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Steve Oualline" <soualline(at)stbernard(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: postmaster startup time |
| Date: | 2006-02-02 02:15:14 |
| Message-ID: | 7477.1138846514@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
"Steve Oualline" <soualline(at)stbernard(dot)com> writes:
> What's the longest time you'd expect between the execution of the=20
> postmaster command and being able to connec?
Normal startup is a second or two on any modern hardware. If you have
to recover from WAL, though, it could be very long. A rule of thumb is
that it shouldn't take longer than your inter-checkpoint time
(checkpoint_timeout) ... but that's only assuming that the most recent
checkpoint attempt before the crash succeeded. We've seen cases where
checkpoints were failing repeatedly (eg, because of out-of-space
condition on the main data partition) but the system kept merrily
spooling transactions into WAL. In a scenario like that, there could be
a whole lot of WAL to replay :-(
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Trans Porter | 2006-02-02 07:04:00 | pgsql on win xp user permissions |
| Previous Message | Bob Pawley | 2006-02-02 01:30:35 | Re: Stack Depth |