Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Chernow <ac(at)esilo(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf
Date: 2009-02-10 15:54:53
Message-ID: 7476.1234281293@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> We could do that, I guess. However, if an application passes this in to
>> an old version of libpq, there is no way to know that it didn't know
>> about it.

> Well, you could create PQinitSSLExtended, but, as you say, the use
> case is pretty narrow...

> It would help if there were a PQgetLibraryVersion() function.

Help how? There is nothing an app can do to work around the problem
AFAICS. Or if there were, we should just document it and not change
the code --- the use case for this is evidently too narrow to justify
complicating libpq's API even more.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2009-02-10 16:03:50 Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf
Previous Message Robert Haas 2009-02-10 15:39:47 Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf