Re: logical decoding and replication of sequences

From: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: logical decoding and replication of sequences
Date: 2022-03-24 21:59:11
Message-ID: 74729cc5-960b-9295-912a-a7c37356a0c4@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

Pushed, after going through the patch once more, addressed the remaining
FIXMEs, corrected a couple places in the docs and comments, etc. Minor
tweaks, nothing important.

I've been thinking about the grammar a bit more after pushing, and I
realized that maybe it'd be better to handle the FOR ALL TABLES /
SEQUENCES clause as PublicationObjSpec, not as a separate/special case.

regards

--
Tomas Vondra
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2022-03-24 22:01:29 Re: logical decoding and replication of sequences
Previous Message Andres Freund 2022-03-24 21:58:22 Re: New Object Access Type hooks