From: | "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: "Relation not found" error but table exits. |
Date: | 2007-03-27 03:32:06 |
Message-ID: | 74722273bd443594a4b0786c04d83dcd@biglumber.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160
> This also ties into the discussions we've had off-and-on about making
> catalog lookups behave in an MVCC fashion instead of using SnapshotNow.
> I'm still pretty hesitant to go there, but maybe we could do something
> involving MVCC for unlocked lookups and then SnapshotNow for (re)reading
> a table's schema info once we've got lock on it.
No ideas, but a strong +1 for making catalog lookups MVCC. Can this perhaps
become a TODO so we don't forget about it and possibly entice people to
give it a go? :)
- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
End Point Corporation
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200703262326
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iD8DBQFGCI8ZvJuQZxSWSsgRA71vAKCNHCRtQUhxVoYKiSmxUAohFSE6TgCeN5qt
sdb4PWjhBn+6sepNPTWkArQ=
=18qw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Zubkovsky, Sergey | 2007-03-27 06:41:25 | "Permission denied" failures occurring on Windows |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-03-27 03:27:15 | Re: BUG #3181: ecpg generating wrong code |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-03-27 04:21:33 | Re: notification payloads |
Previous Message | Hiroshi Saito | 2007-03-27 03:01:41 | Re: Proposal: Adding JIS X 0213 support |