From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, m_lists(at)yahoo(dot)it |
Subject: | Re: Review: Patch: Allow substring/replace() to get/set bit values |
Date: | 2010-01-25 21:00:39 |
Message-ID: | 7472.1264453239@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> writes:
> Leonardo F wrote:
>> New version of the patch, let me know if I can fix/change something
>> else.
> All issues addressed, with one tiny nit-pick -- the get_bit and
> set_bit methods are not part of the SQL standard. I took the liberty
> of removing "SQL-standard" from the documentation of these functions
> so that I can mark this "Ready for Committer".
Applied with some further editorialization. When I looked at how
OVERLAY(text) was implemented, I didn't like it at all, so I took the
liberty of transforming it to C code and then duplicating that
implementation for bit and bytea. I doubt this would make any
performance difference in simple cases, but it will have less surprise
factor.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2010-01-25 21:24:42 | Re: default pg_hba.conf tabulation |
Previous Message | Greg Smith | 2010-01-25 20:40:56 | Re: Clustering Docs WAS: Mammoth in Core? |