Re: [HACKERS] snprintf() argument reordering not working under Windows

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Nicolai Tufar <ntufar(at)gmail(dot)com>, devrim(at)kivi(dot)com(dot)tr, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] snprintf() argument reordering not working under Windows
Date: 2005-12-03 17:00:32
Message-ID: 742.1133629232@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> I am also thinking of modifying the code so if we are using snprintf.c
> only because we need positional parameter control, we check for '$' in
> the string and only use snprintf.c in those cases.

What's the point? If the code is in there we may as well use it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Brown 2005-12-03 17:09:53 Re: Reducing relation locking overhead
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-12-03 16:57:49 Re: Reducing relation locking overhead

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-12-03 17:19:00 Re: [HACKERS] snprintf() argument reordering not working under
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2005-12-03 16:46:11 Re: BUG #2056: to_char no long takes time as input?