From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Brian Minton <bminton(at)efn(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: get_bit etc. |
Date: | 2002-11-21 05:02:01 |
Message-ID: | 7414.1037854921@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Brian Minton <bminton(at)efn(dot)org> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> A documentation patch would be welcomed.
> ok, how do I do that?
Ideally, send a patch diff against the appropriate .sgml file in the doc
source tree to pgsql-patches. If you're not up for patching SGML, write
some plain ASCII text that would fit into the docs and send it to
pgsql-docs; somebody will take care of marking it up in SGML and
committing it where it belongs.
> They are simple enough functions, and it was easy
> to figure out what they did, but there is no mention of them, I guess
> maybe they are "unofficial" functions.
No, they're clearly intended as user-accessible functions. I'd say the
author was too dern lazy to include any documentation when he submitted
the code patch :-(. We have a lot of that disease goin' round.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Justin Clift | 2002-11-21 05:03:18 | Re: [GENERAL] Bug with sequence |
Previous Message | Justin Clift | 2002-11-21 04:59:14 | Re: Dumb Newbie Question - Mandrake 9.0 / PGSQL 7.2 |