Re: get_bit etc.

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Brian Minton <bminton(at)efn(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: get_bit etc.
Date: 2002-11-21 05:02:01
Message-ID: 7414.1037854921@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Brian Minton <bminton(at)efn(dot)org> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> A documentation patch would be welcomed.

> ok, how do I do that?

Ideally, send a patch diff against the appropriate .sgml file in the doc
source tree to pgsql-patches. If you're not up for patching SGML, write
some plain ASCII text that would fit into the docs and send it to
pgsql-docs; somebody will take care of marking it up in SGML and
committing it where it belongs.

> They are simple enough functions, and it was easy
> to figure out what they did, but there is no mention of them, I guess
> maybe they are "unofficial" functions.

No, they're clearly intended as user-accessible functions. I'd say the
author was too dern lazy to include any documentation when he submitted
the code patch :-(. We have a lot of that disease goin' round.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Clift 2002-11-21 05:03:18 Re: [GENERAL] Bug with sequence
Previous Message Justin Clift 2002-11-21 04:59:14 Re: Dumb Newbie Question - Mandrake 9.0 / PGSQL 7.2