Re: Non-text mode for pg_dumpall

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Non-text mode for pg_dumpall
Date: 2024-06-10 16:21:03
Message-ID: 740696.1718036463@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 5:03 PM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
>> Is there a particular advantage to that approach as opposed to just using
>> "directory" mode for everything?

> A gazillion files to deal with? Much easier to work with individual custom
> files if you're moving databases around and things like that.
> Much easier to monitor eg sizes/dates if you're using it for backups.

You can always tar up the directory tree after-the-fact if you want
one file. Sure, that step's not parallelized, but I think we'd need
some non-parallelized copying to create such a file anyway.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Laurenz Albe 2024-06-10 17:00:20 Re: Wrong security context for deferred triggers?
Previous Message Nathan Bossart 2024-06-10 16:20:18 Re: Non-text mode for pg_dumpall