| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Initial release notes created for 9.6 |
| Date: | 2016-05-06 01:36:05 |
| Message-ID: | 7404.1462498565@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> writes:
> On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 5:54 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Oh, now I see why it's not here: it was back-patched into 9.5, so it
>> will not be a new feature in 9.6.0. It will be listed in the 9.5.3
>> release notes, instead.
> I was really hoping that the OpenSSL bugfix patch would receive the
> same treatment (commit 7c7d4fddab82dc756d8caa67b1b31fcdde355aab).
> Should I take its inclusion here in the 9.6 release notes as
> portending a backpatch never happening?
No, it just means that hasn't happened yet.
> There seems to be a lack of urgency about it,
Perhaps, or maybe it's just a lack of cycles. I certainly haven't
had any time to think about it.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-05-06 01:37:09 | Re: Initial release notes created for 9.6 |
| Previous Message | Steve Crawford | 2016-05-06 01:21:18 | Feature request: make cluster_name GUC useful for psql prompts |