Re: Problem with ssl and psql in Postgresql 13

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Gustavsson Mikael <mikael(dot)gustavsson(at)smhi(dot)se>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Svensson Peter <peter(dot)svensson(at)smhi(dot)se>
Subject: Re: Problem with ssl and psql in Postgresql 13
Date: 2020-12-23 21:56:07
Message-ID: 740093.1608760567@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> * Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
>> In the meantime, I did spot a code path that would explain the symptoms:
>> pqsecure_open_gss() clears allow_ssl_try sooner than it oughta. If
>> gss_wrap_size_limit() failed for some reason, we'd abandon the GSS
>> connection and try another one, and we would *not* try to SSL-ify
>> the new one.

> There are certainly some very odd GSSAPI implementations out there
> (including hacked up things particularly on Macs that we've seen..),
> though I've not run into one where I've seen that call fail.

The OP said he's on RHEL 8.3, so it ought to be mostly-stock Kerberos.
I've just been digging through the SRPM to see if they'd done anything
odd for FIPS mode or the like, and I'm not really finding anything.

> If it did fail though, surely the error messages would make that
> clear, and we're not seeing that here..?

No, because we won't report the failure from gss_wrap_size_limit;
we just discard that connection and try again.

> I'm not sure how, but it sure seems like somehow, in this case, we're
> going through the GSSAPI encryption code because we find GSSAPI
> credentials (entirely possible, even if you're not using them for
> talking to PG), the server responds with a "I haven't got support for
> that" in some fashion, and we're skipping SSL at that point. How that's
> happening isn't clear to me though, but the idea that it's because
> gss_wrap_size_limit() is failing seems very unlikely.

I already spent most of the day on theories like that, without any
success. I agree that this theory seems quite unlikely, but you
remember what Sherlock Holmes said.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-12-23 22:34:05 Re: Problem with ssl and psql in Postgresql 13
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2020-12-23 21:45:34 Re: Problem with ssl and psql in Postgresql 13