Re: [HACKERS] oid8/int28

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] oid8/int28
Date: 2000-01-11 00:30:01
Message-ID: 7393.947550601@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Tom, I can't find any cases where 7 or 9 are used to represent the
> maximum number of attributes indexed.

Could be they're all gone; I know I've seen some in the past though.

Some brave soul should try increasing the constant and then using
indexes with > 8 columns... better compile -g and --enable-casserts ;-)

regards, tom lane

In response to

  • oid8/int28 at 2000-01-10 16:24:44 from Bruce Momjian

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-01-11 00:35:57 Re: [HACKERS] Changing oidvector length
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-01-10 23:08:05 initdb fixed