From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>, Alexander Shutyaev <shutyaev(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_upgrade and wraparound |
Date: | 2018-06-11 17:14:12 |
Message-ID: | 7382.1528737252@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> I suspect the issue is that pg_resetwal does:
> if (set_xid != 0)
> {
> ControlFile.checkPointCopy.nextXid = set_xid;
> /*
> * For the moment, just set oldestXid to a value that will force
> * immediate autovacuum-for-wraparound. It's not clear whether adding
> * user control of this is useful, so let's just do something that's
> * reasonably safe. The magic constant here corresponds to the
> * maximum allowed value of autovacuum_freeze_max_age.
> */
> ControlFile.checkPointCopy.oldestXid = set_xid - 2000000000;
> if (ControlFile.checkPointCopy.oldestXid < FirstNormalTransactionId)
> ControlFile.checkPointCopy.oldestXid += FirstNormalTransactionId;
> ControlFile.checkPointCopy.oldestXidDB = InvalidOid;
> }
> but we have codepath that doesn't check for oldestXidDB being
> InvalidOid. Not great.
Hm, I think I'd define the problem as "pg_resetwal is violating the
expectation that oldestXidDB be valid".
However, this just explains the basically-cosmetic issue that the
complaint message mentions OID 0. It doesn't really get us to the
answer to why Alexander is seeing a failure. It might be useful
to see pg_controldata output for the old cluster, as well as
"select datname, datfrozenxid from pg_database" output from the
old cluster.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2018-06-11 17:29:25 | Re: pg_upgrade and wraparound |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2018-06-11 17:08:12 | Re: pg_upgrade and wraparound |